Wednesday, 3 April 2019

Middle Eastern protests challenge debilitating Gulf counterrevolution



By James M. Dorsey
A podcast version of this story is available on Soundcloud, Itunes, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn and Tumblr

Much of the Middle East’s recent turmoil stems from internecine Middle Eastern rivalries spilling onto third country battlefields and Saudi and United Arab Emirates-led efforts to roll back the achievements of the 2011 popular Arab revolts and pre-empt further uprisings.

So does the record of the past eight years. The counterrevolution’s one success, Egypt, has produced some of the harshest repression in the country’s history.
Saudi and UAE intervention in Yemen has sparked one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises, tarnished the image of the two Gulf states, and provided opportunity to Iran to expand its network of regional proxies.
In a twist of irony, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt, who justify the Yemen war by pointing to an invitation by the internationally recognized exile government of  president Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, support the rebel forces of Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar in Libya.
In Syria, rivals Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar, who exasperated the country’s eight-year long devastating civil war by backing rival rebel forces, are back to square one: the man they wanted to remove from office, president Bashar al-Assad, has gained the upper hand with the support of Russia and Iran.
The protests in Algeria and Sudan suggest that the social, economic and political grievances that fuelled the 2011 protests continue to hover just below the surface in a swath of land that stretches from the Atlantic coast of Africa to the Gulf.
Like in 2011, protests in the Middle East are not isolated incidents but the most dramatic part of a more global wave prompted by a loss of public confidence in leaders and political systems that has sparked anti-government demonstrations in countries as far flung as Zimbabwe and Haiti.
The Algerian and Sudanese protests come on the back of a wave of smaller, political and socio- economic protests since 2011 that suggested that the Middle Eastern counterrevolution amounted to putting a lid on a pot that could boil over at any moment. Protests have erupted in recent years in a host of countries, including Iraq, Morocco, Jordan, Lebanon and Tunisia.
The protests also suggest the fragility of hopes of Middle Eastern autocrats that China’s model of successfully growing the economy, creating jobs and opportunity, and delivering public goods coupled with increased political control and suppression of rights would prove to be a sustainable model in their own backyard.
The fragility of the model is enhanced by the tendency of autocrats to overreach in ways that either distract from their core goals or pursue objectives like the creation of a ‘new man’ that ultimately have failed in countries like Turkey.
Turkey’s Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) has been in power for the better part of two decades. Its success suggests that the effort to create a secular New Turk by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the visionary who carved modern Turkey out of the ruins of the Ottoman empire almost a century ago, has stumbled.
Egyptian general-turned president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Chinese leader Xi Jinping have taken control and civilisationalism to new extremes by seeking not only absolute political power but also the ability to shape culture and dictate personal behaviour.
Mr. Al-Sisi recently ordered his officials to dictate the themes and scripts of Egyptian soap operas, a popular regional staple, particularly during the holy month of Ramadan. A military-linked production company has taken charge of some of Egypt’s biggest and most successful shows.
Film directors have been instructed to focus on shows that praise the military and law enforcement and demonize the Muslim Brotherhood, a group that has been brutally targeted by Mr. Al-Sisi as well as the UAE that together with Saudi Arabia backed his 2013 military coup. The coup toppled Mohammed Morsi, a Brother and Egypt’s first and only democratically elected president.
Mr. Xi’s hopes to promote ‘core socialist values’ such as patriotism, harmony and civility amounts to an effort to counter individualism, materialism and hedonism. The campaign involves blurring piercings and jewellery worn by male pop stars during performances on television and the Internet, obliging soccer players to wear long sleeves to cover their tattoos, and ensuring that women conference hosts raise their necklines and rappers restrict their lyrics to promotion of peace and harmony.
Saudi Arabia has argued that journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul six months ago by rogue government operatives who are currently standing trial in a process that lacks transparency and has called into question the kingdom’s version of events.
The overreach suggests that Middle Eastern autocrats are unlikely to respond to the protests in Algeria and Sudan any differently than they did in 2011.
Analyst Giorgio Cafiero predicts that in the wake of Mr. Bouteflika’s resignation, Saudi Arabia is likely to support efforts to maintain control by what Algerians call Le Pouvoir (The Power) or the deep state, a cabal of military and security officials and business tycoons, The same is likely to be true for the UAE.
Similarly, Saudi Arabia and the UAE alongside Egypt continue to back Mr. Al-Bashir although he is on the defensive after months of protests that have rocked the East African state.
Whether Algeria’s ancien regime backed by Gulf states is able to retain power may well be dependent on what conclusions protesters draw from the experience of the 2011 revolts.
Like the protesters than, Algerian demonstrators need to decide whether Mr. Bouteflika’s resignation is a sufficient enough success to justify surrender of their street power and return to a structured political process.
Indications are that the protesters have learnt their lesson.
"Algerians are very realistic. This is a beautiful victory, a tangible first step but they know that more has to be done. They are not satisfied entirely ... they want all of them to be gone," said Algeria scholar Dalia Ghanem.
"Algerians are calling for radical change, a change in leadership. They didn't want Bouteflika, they don't want Bouteflika's family, or Bouteflika's clan -- and they don't want the old guard to stay in power,” Ms. Ghanem added.
Dr. James M Dorsey is a senior fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, adjunct senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Middle East Institute and co-director of the University of Wuerzburg’s Institute of Fan Culture



بھکر میں ہوا ٹریفک مینجمنٹ کے سلسلہ میں ہنگامی اجلاس

ڈپٹی کمشنر/ چیئرمین ڈسٹرکٹ ریجنل ٹرانسپورٹ اتھارٹی (ڈی آر ٹی اے )وقا ص رشید نے ٹریفک مینجمنٹ کے سلسلہ میں ہنگامی اجلاس کی صدارت کرتے ہوئے کہا ہے کہ ضلع بھر میں تمام بین الاضلاعی روٹس پر پبلک ٹرانسپورٹ گاڑیوں کو ٹریفک ریگولیشنزکا پابند بنانے ،گاڑیوں کی فٹنس کی اچانک چیکنگ اور حد رفتار کی مانیٹرنگ ،ٹریفک ریگولیشنز کی خلاف ورزی میں ملوث گاڑیوں کے خلاف سخت ترین قانونی کارروائی ،قابل مرمت سڑکوں کی فوری بہتری یقینی بنانے اور مصروف شاہراہوں پر ڈرائیورز کی راہنمائی کیلئے حد رفتار والے سائن بورڈز کی تنصیب سمیت احتیاطی تدابیر سے آگاہی پر مبنی جامع پلان مرتب کیا گیا ہے تاکہ ٹریفک حادثات کا باعث بننے والے جملہ عوامل کا خاتمہ کرکے مسافروں کیلئے سفر کو ہر لحاظ سے محفوظ بنایا جاسکے ۔


ڈپٹی کمشنر / چیئرمین ڈی آر ٹی اے وقا ص رشید نے اجلاس سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے ڈی آر ٹی اے انتظامیہ ،ٹریفک پولیس ،موٹر وہیکل ایگزامینر اور ہائی ویز ڈپارٹمنٹ کے افسران کو احکامات جاری کئے کہ ٹریفک مینجمنٹ پلان پر مقررہ ترجیحات کیمطابق موئثر عملدرآمد یقینی بنانے کیلئے متعلقہ دائرہ کار میں سونپی گئی ذمہ داریوں کی احسن تکمیل یقینی بنائی جائے ۔اجلاس میں ڈی پی او شائستہ ندیم ،اے ڈی سی جی خالدمسعود فروکہ ،ایکسئین ہائی ویز ،سیکریٹری ڈی آر ٹی اے ،ڈپٹی ڈائریکٹر ڈویلپمنٹ ،موٹر وہیکلز ایگزامینر ،ریسکیو 1122 ،ٹریفک پولیس اور دیگر متعلقہ شعبوں کے افسران نے شرکت کی ۔ڈپٹی کمشنر / چیئرمین ڈی آر ٹی اے نے کہاکہ پبلک ٹرانسپورٹ گاڑیوں کو مکمل مانیٹرنگ کے تحت تیز رفتاری سے باز رکھنے کیلئے ضلع کے اندر تمام بین الاضلاعی روٹس پر نقطہ آغاز سے اختتامی حدود تک فاصلہ کے اعتبار سے سفری وقت کا تعین بھی کر دیا گیا ہے جس کی پیروی نہ کرنے والی گاڑیوں کے خلاف سخت ترین قانونی کارروائی فوری طور پر مکمل کی جائے گی ۔انہوں نے واضح کیاکہ باقاعدہ فٹنس سرٹیفیکٹس کے بغیر گاڑیوں کو چلنے نہیں دیا جائے گا تا وقتیکہ وہ مجاز اتھارٹی کا جاری کردہ فٹنس سرٹیفیکٹ پیش کریں ۔انہوں نے ایکسئین ہائی ویز کو ہدایت کی کہ سڑکوں کے قابل مرمت پیچز کی مرمت کا معیاری عمل بلاتاخیر مکمل کیا جائے اور گنجان آباد یوں میں سپیڈ بریکرز بھی بنائے جائیں ۔ڈی پی او شائستہ ندیم نے اجلاس سے خطاب کرتے ہوئے ٹریفک پولیس انتظامیہ کو احکامات جاری کئے کہ ٹریفک قوانین کا کامل نفاذ یقینی بنایا جائے اور اٹھارہ سال سے کم عمر اور لائسنس کے بغیر ڈرائیورز کے خلاف زیرو ٹالرینس کے تحت قانونی کارروائی کی جائے ۔انہوں نے ہدایت کی کہ پبلک ٹرانسپورٹ سمیت بھاری گاڑیوں کو بائی پاس روڈ استعمال کرنے کا پابند بنایا جائے اور مین روڈ پر رکشاؤں کو ہرگز نہ چلنے دیا جائے ۔ڈی پی او نے ٹریفک انچارج کو مزید ہدایت کی کہ ٹریفک قوانین سے متعلق آگاہی عام کرنے کیلئے تعلیمی اداروں میں خصوصی لیکچرز کا بھی اہتمام کیا جائے

خوشاب پولیس کا ایسا کونسا کارنامہ کہ پنجاب بھر سے شاباشی ملی

خوشاب پولیس کی"اکاون لاکھ ساٹھ ہزار"کی رکوری کےساتھ اہم ترین کامیابی، محسن آہیرپمپ
سمیت

 صوبہ بھرمیں خونی ڈکیتیاں کرنےوالہ گرہومیڈیاکےسامنےپیش


گرہو کا ایک ساتھی پولیس مقابلہ میں ہلاک جبکہ بقیہ تین گرفتار، ملزمان سے عوام سے چھینہ گیا اکاون لاکھ ساٹھ ہزار اور وارداتوں میں استعمال ہونے والہ اسلحلہ برآمد، جبکہ اہل خوشاب کی جانب سے ڈی پی او خوشاب عبادت نثار کو اس بڑی کاروائی پر خراج ت


حسین

Economic reform in the Gulf: Who benefits, really?

For Gulf leaders, long-overdue economic reforms were never going to be easy.
Leaders like the crown princes of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, Mohammed bin Salman and Mohammed bin Zayed, quickly discovered that copying China’s model of economic growth while tightening political control was easier said than done. They realised that rewriting social contracts funded by oil wealth was more difficult because Gulf Arabs had far more to lose than the average Chinese. The Gulf states’ social contracts had worked in ways China’s welfare programmes had not. The Gulf’s rentier state’s bargain—surrender of political and social rights for cradle-to-grave welfare—had produced a win-win situation for the longest time.

Moreover, Gulf leaders, struggling with mounting criticism of the Saudi-UAE-led war in Yemen and the fall-out of the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, also lacked the political and economic clout that allowed China to largely silence or marginalise critics of its crackdown on Turkic Muslims in the troubled northwestern province of Xinjiang.
The absence of a welfare-based social contract in China allowed the government to power economic growth, lift millions out of poverty, and provide public goods without forcing ordinary citizens to suffer pain. As a result, China was able to push through with economic reforms without having to worry that reduced welfare benefits would spark a public backlash and potentially threaten the regime.
Three years into Mohammed bin Salman’s Vision 2030 blueprint for diversification of the economy, Saudi businesses and consumers complain that they are feeling the pinch of utility price hikes and a recently introduced five per cent value-added tax with little confidence that the government will stay the course to ensure promised long-term benefit.
The government’s commitment to cutting costs has been further called into question by annual handouts worth billions of dollars since the announcement of the reforms and rewriting of the social contract to cushion the impact of rising costs and quash criticism.
In contrast to China, investment in the Gulf, whether it is domestic or foreign, comes from financial, technology and other services sector, the arms industry or governments. It is focused on services, infrastructure or enhancing the state’s capacities rather than on manufacturing, industrial development and the nurturing of private sector.
With the exception of national oil companies, some state-run airlines and petrochemical companies, the bulk of Gulf investment is portfolios managed by sovereign wealth funds, trophies or investment designed to enhance a country’s prestige and soft power.
By contrast, Asian economies such as China and India have used investment fight poverty, foster a substantial middle class, and create an industrial base. To be sure, with small populations, Gulf states are more likely to ensure sustainability in services and oil and gas derivatives rather than in manufacturing and industry.
China’s $1 trillion Belt and Road initiative may be the Asian exception that would come closest to some of the Gulf’s soft-power investments. Yet, the BRI, designed to alleviate domestic overcapacity by state-owned firms that are not beholden to shareholders’ short-term demands and/or geo-political gain, contributes to China’s domestic growth.
To be sure, China is no less autocratic than the Gulf states, while Hindu nationalism in India fits a global trend towards civilisationalism, populism and illiberal democracy. What differentiates much of Asia from the Gulf and accounts for its economic success are policies that ensure a relatively stable environment. These policies are focused on social and economic enhancement rather than primarily on regime survival. That may be Asia’s lesson for Gulf rulers.
Asian nations have been able to manage investors’ expectations in an environment of relative political stability. By contrast, Saudi Arabia damaged confidence in its ability to diversify its oil-based economy when after repeated delays it suspended plans to list five per cent of its national oil company, Saudi Arabian Oil Company, or Aramco, in what would have been the world’s largest initial public offering.

Wednesday, 21 February 2018

"HISTORY"Muhammad Bin Qasim


Muhammad Bin Qasim !

Muhammad bin Qasim was born around 695 AD. He belonged to the Saqqafi tribe; that had originated from Taif in Arabia. He grew up in the care of his mother; he soon became a great asset to his uncle Muhammad Ibn Yusuf, the governor of Yemen. His judgment, potential and skills left many other officers and forced the ruler to appoint him in the state department. He was also a close relative of Hajjaj bin Yousuf, because of the influence of Hajjaj, the young Muhammad bin Qasim was appointed the governor of Persia while in his teens, and he crushed the rebellion in that region. There is also a popular tradition that presents him as the son-in-law of Hajjaj bin Yousuf. He conquered the Sindh and Punjab regions along the Indus River for the Umayyad Caliphate.
There are both long and short term causes for the conquest of india. Arabs had trade with India and Eastern Asia. The trade was carried through sea rout; the rout was unsafe due to the plunder of the Pirates of Sindh. The Arab rebels also get refuge in Sindh. Thus the Umayyad wanted to consolidate their rule and also to secure the trade rout. During Hajjaj’s governorship, the Mids of Debal (Pirates) plundered the gifts of Ceylon’s ruler to Hijjaj and attacked on ships of Arab that were carrying the orphans and widows of Muslim soldiers who died in Sri Lanka. Thus providing the Umayyad Caliphate the legitimate cause, that enabled them to gain a foothold in the Makran, and Sindh regions.
The Umayyad caliphate ordered Muhammad Bin Qasim to attack over Sindh. He led 6,000 Syrian cavalry and at the borders of Sindh he was joined by an advance guard and six thousand camel riders and with five catapults (Manjaniks). Muhammad Bin Qasim first captured Debal, from where the Arab army marched along the Indus. At Rohri he was met by Dahir’s forces. Dahir died in the battle, his forces were defeated and Muhammad bin Qasim took control of Sind. Mohammad Bin Qasim entered Daibul in 712 AD. As a result of his efforts, he succeeded in capturing Daibul. He continued his Victorious Progress in succession, Nirun, fortress (called Sikka), Brahmanabad, Alor, Multan and Gujrat. After the conquest of Multan, he carried his arms to the borders of Kigdom of Kashmir, but his dismissal stopped the further advance. Now Muslims were the masters of whole Sindh and a part of Punjab up to the borders of Kashmir in the north. After the conquest, he adopted a conciliatory policy, asking for acceptance of Muslim rule by the natives in return for non-interference in their religious and cultural practices. He also established peace with a strong taxation system. In return he provided the guaranty of security of life and property for the natives. Hajjaj died in 714. When Walid Bin Abdul Malik died, his younger brother Suleman succeeded as the Caliph. He was a bitter enemy of Hajjaj’s family. He recalled Mohammad Bin Qasim from Sindh, who obeyed the orders as the duty of a general. When he came back, he was put to death on 18th of July, 715AD at the age of twenty.(Thanks:
Khalid Jelani Tiwana)

Tuesday, 20 February 2018

Alexei Kosygin, Soviet politician, 8th Premier of the Soviet Union (d. 1980)


"HISTORY"
1904 – Alexei Kosygin, Soviet politician, 8th Premier of the Soviet Union (d. 1980)
Alexei Nikolayevich Kosygin (20 February 1904 – 18 December 1980) was a Soviet-Russian statesman during the Cold War. Kosygin was born in the city of St. Petersburg in 1904 to a Russian working class family. He was conscripted into the labour army during the Russian Civil War, and after the Red Army's demobilisation in 1921, he worked in Siberia as an industrial manager. Kosygin returned to Leningrad in the early 1930s and worked his way up the Soviet hierarchy. During the Great Patriotic War (World War II), Kosygin was a member of the State Defence Committee and was tasked with moving Soviet industry out of territories soon to be overrun by the German military. He served as Minister of Finance for a year before becoming Minister of Light Industry and later, the Minister of Light and Food Industry. One year before his death in 1953, Stalin removed Kosygin from the Politburo, intentionally weakening his position within the Soviet hierarchy.
After the power struggle triggered by Stalin's death in 1953, Nikita Khrushchev became the new leader. On 20 March 1959, Kosygin was appointed to the position of Chairman of the State Planning Committee (Gosplan), a post he would hold for little more than a year. Kosygin next became First Deputy Chairman of the Council of Ministers. When Khrushchev was replaced in 1964, Kosygin and Leonid Brezhnev became Premier and First Secretary respectively. Kosygin, along with Brezhnev and Nikolai Podgorny, the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, was a member of the newly established collective leadership. Kosygin became one of two major power players within the Soviet hierarchy, the other being Brezhnev, and was able to initiate the failed 1965 economic reform, usually referred to simply as the Kosygin reform. This reform, along with his more open stance on solving the Prague Spring (1968), made Kosygin one of the most liberal members of the top leadership.
Some of Kosygin's policies were seen as too radical, particularly by more conservative members of the top leadership. However, they were never able to depose Kosygin as Premier, even if he and Brezhnev disliked each other. By the 1970s, Brezhnev had consolidated enough power to stop any "radical" reform-minded attempts by Kosygin. In 1980, Kosygin retired from office due to bad health, dying two months later on 18 December 1980.(Thanks:
Khalid Jelani Tiwana)

Al-Musta'sim, Iraqi caliph (b. 1213)"HISTORY"


"HISTORY"
1258 – Al-Musta'sim, Iraqi caliph (b. 1213)
Al-Musta'sim Billah (1213 – February 20, 1258) was the last Abbasid Caliph in Baghdad; he ruled from 1242 until his death.
Biography:
Al-Musta'sim succeeded his father in late 1242.


He is noted for his opposition to the rise of Shajar al-Durr to the Egyptian throne during the Seventh Crusade. He sent a message from Baghdad to the Mamluks in Egypt that said: "If you do not have men there tell us so we can send you men.". However, Al-Musta'sim had to face the greatest menace against the caliphate since its establishment in 632, the invasion of the Mongol forces that, under Hulagu Khan, had already wiped out any resistance in Transoxiana and Khorasan. In 1255/1256 Hulagu forced the Abbasid to lend their forces for the campaign against Alamut.
In 1258 Hulagu invaded the Abbasid domain, comprising a little more than what is now Iraq and Syria. In an advance on Baghdad, Hulagu Khan had several columns advance simultaneously on the city, and laid siege to it. The Caliph had been deluded by promises from his Vizier that the Mongols could be driven off literally by the women of the city throwing stones at them, and did the worst of all things: nothing. He neither raised an army to defend Baghdad nor did he attempt to negotiate with Hulagu. Instead he sent weak threats to the Mongol warlord.
Baghdad was sacked on February 10 and the caliph was killed by Hulagu Khan soon afterwards. It is reckoned that the Mongols did not want to shed "royal blood", so they wrapped him in a rug and trampled him to death with their horses. Some of his sons were massacred as well; one of the surviving sons was sent as a prisoner to Mongolia, where Mongolian historians report he married and fathered children, but played no role in Islam thereafter.

The Travels of Marco Polo reports that upon finding the caliph's great stores of treasure which could have been spent on the defense of his realm, Hulagu Khan locked him in his treasure room without food or water, telling him "eat of thy treasure as much as thou wilt, since thou art so fond of it."
The Mamluk sultans and Syria later appointed an Abbasid Caliph in Cairo, but they were even more symbolic than by now marginalized Abbasid Caliphs in Baghdad. They were ignored by the rest of the Muslim world. Even though they kept the title for about 250 years more, other than installing the Sultan in ceremonies, these Caliphs had little importance.
After the Ottomans conquered Egypt in 1517, the Abbasid Caliph of Egypt, Al-Mutawakkil III was transported to Constantinople, and Sultan Selim I announced himself to be a Caliph.(Thanks:Khalid Jelani Tiwana)

سنٹر سٹی بیوٹیفکیشن پلان" پر جاری کام کی تفصیلی جائزہ

کمشنر سرگودہا ڈویژن جہانزیب اعوان کی زیر صدارت اعلیٰ سطحی اجلاس ان کے کانفرنس روم میں منعقد ہوا جس میں وزیراعلیٰ پنجاب کے فلیگ شپ منصوبے ...